MS1234 wrote:
Thanks Luis.
I take it, then, that neither the folder nor the subfolder can be made to show that they have changed, when their contents are altered, and there's nothing I can do about it.
I hope Apple will note this problem and do something about it.
I can understand your point of view. But let me try to explain why Apple will not "do something about it".
In a sense, even if you have a hierarchy of folders A/B/C/D/E and add a new file to E "now", you could defend that something deep inside A has changed, so the date must change; in that interpretation, you would have all the modified dates for A, B, C, D, E to be changed to "now". But also, in a way, that could be perplexing. Imagine looking at A suddenly have a new date when you look at it and it has the exact same files as before.
Philosophical things aside, the fact is a folder - called a "directory" in Unix terms - is in reality just a special kind of file, that lists the contents thereof. So the contents of A would be the things that sit directly inside A, like B and possibly other files. By changing E, nothing physically changes in A: the file A (again, a directory is just a file with special "flag", and a list of contents) did NOT, in effect, change, at all.
This is something that is working in a very definite way, has worked like this ever since Unix began to exist in the late 1970s. It is not a bug, it is working as intended - even if it does not match the expectations of some users.