If you use the Photos app to merge the libraries you'll lose all folders and projects in the imported library.
However, if you use the paid version of PowerPhotos you'll get the albums and projects as albums.
This is a comparison of the merge capabilities of PowerPhotos vs Photos:
I ran a number of tests with a 3119 photo, 72 video and 97 keyword Photos library with keywords, captions, keywords and locations. I merged it into an empty library using Photos and PowerPhotos. This is what I found was imported by each;
PowerPhotos: Photos:
Albums*** -----------
Smart Albums (as regular albums)** -----------
Folders Containing Albums -----------
Captions Captions
Titles Titles
Keywords* Keywords (some but not all: …
…see Note *)
Original images Original images
Edited images Edited images
--------------- Locations
Favorites Favorites
Can detect and exclude Duplicates
duplicates upon import or not
Neither method could import/merge projects.
Both methods could import older iPhoto libraries into a Photos library when the iPhoto library couldn't be migrated into a Photos library.
Notes:
*The Photos app only imported 84 keywords our of 97. PowerPhotos merged 147 keywords. Photos only imported keywords that were embedded in the original file and not those added by Photos. PowerPhotos imported all of them.
**The original library had 90 Smart Albums. All were merged by PowerPhotos but, as indicated above, the Smart albums were brought over as regular albums. No album of any kind were imported by Photos. Also only PowerPhotos imported folders.
The original library had 34 regular albums and 1 folder with some nested albums. PowerPhotos merger all of them successfully.
The original library had 72 videos. Photos imported only 57. PowerPhoto got all 72 in its merge. In other tests Photos got all videos. All in all PowerPhotos is a much better candidate for merging libraries - in my opinion.
