MacBook Pro M4 with thunderbolt 5 and portable monitor

Still no word? I know nothing about programming and still it seems like a light fix. I have having the 2 cables.

please helppppo

Is apple doing anything to fix this problem? Or do they simply not care? Its been months.

Just got a MBP M4 and seeing the same issue. Any updates? Thanks!

I recently upgraded my Mac as well and was having the same issue. I have no clue what happened or what I did but both now are working and functioning with a single USB-C and no need for the mini HDMI. I just unplugged them and used it to game through my PS5. When I was done, I connected the one that was not working, and it finally came on. I said what the heck and decided to plug in the second one, and it came on with no issue. I work in IT, so this checks out as a fix haha, if you work in IT you'll get that joke. I honestly changed nothing and downloaded nothing. I wish I could say I did so I could help you all out but I have no clue what changed to make this work, and above is exactly what I did.

For sake of argument, have you taken your Mac to a Best Buy to see if any other monitors work better?

It could be there is a needed firmware update, or something has worn.

For sake of argument, have you made a copy of an older operating system to see if indeed it is the OS update which is incompatible as you claim?

You can use internet recovery to install an older OS on a separate partition of your Mac, the OS that shipped with the Mac.

Grant has a good point. The System Profiler makes it obvious why some of these issues exist.

USB/Thunderbolt is still serial. If you know anything about serially connected electronic devices they all work based on the weakest link of the chain. Have webcam in the mix? Its power will bring down the whole bus to the lowest power speed denominator. Have a USB-2 cable on one bus of the CPU, that's all the speed you'll get from the device. Wall powered hubs and docking stations help alleviate power drains on the built-in USB bus of the computer.

When Apple first adopted USB-C in 2016, I was stunned how a bus powered external hard drive was never seen through the hub, unless it had enough power passing through.

So dig through the profiler closely to see what's draining power and speed.

in that presentation, click graphics/displays to see what port and what rules {thunderBolt, USB, other} are governing that display.

then go to that port and see what's up.

You have not talked about ONE specific model display, so all we can do is talk generalities so far.

if your display connects as a Thunderbolt device, it may not support obtaining power from the Mac.

if you display connects as a USB device, it may support being powered by the Mac's Bus power

I have lost track of what your fundamental question is through all of this.

¿could you lay out the case again, and what you are trying to determine?

Sorry for the confusion Grant, I seemed to have hijacked dragos's original post with my own different one.

I was just wondering why my M4 Pro Mac mini can't do what my M2 Pro Mac mini does, i.e. power the same 15 inch portable monitor on its own without requiring external power, I'm using the same cable on both. Could it be something to do with the Thunderbolt 5 port.

Grant I recently purchased a MB Pro 16 M4 with a Max chip. I was under the belief that Thunderbolt 5 was a standard for this configuration. However, the hardware listed on the machine delivered shows all three ports as Thunderbolt 4. Went to Apple Store to look and all of their M4 Max and Pro units also showed Thunderbolt 4.

Have you seen this elsewhere? Has anyone purchased a machine that shows a Thunderbolt 5 in the hardware overview?

Please advise. Thank you.

Thunderbolt-5 only shows as available on the 7 port models, which are the 14" and 16" models.

The 13" and 15" model only show Thunderbolt 4 on Apple's website.

Use a 20" ruler or tape measure and take it to the screen diagonally to figure out its actual measurement.

https://www.tomsguide.com/computing/thunderbolt-5-vs-thunderbolt-4

The true lithmous is the amount of charge your Mac gets when hooked up with a 240W charger.

If they only get significantly less, then there is something to be said about that. Both Dell and HP have CAD/GIS laptops that uses two Thunderbolt ports together to achieve higher wattage. It sounds like from the spec, thunderbolt 5 seaks to offer that without the extra cable.

USB-C Power Delivery provides a mechanism to negotiate the delivery of power in either direction.

It doesn’t mandate that devices be willing to provide power, though. It only provides a negotiation mechanism and a standard for power delivery for those that do want to provide it.

You seem to be confusing your desire to power a display off the MBP’s battery for a standards based mandate that the MBP must provide that power. And you keep refusing to help people with any specifics that might help someone to figure out what is the case.

dragos-florin wrote:

Both laptops offer or the monitor accepts at the highest ~ 12W/5A

That photo shows a voltage of 4.84V and a current of 2.48A for a power level of 12W.

That almost sounds like Power Delivery negotiations failed, and the monitor is trying to draw traditional 5V power on the assumption that the USB-C cable can support 5V @ 3A (15W).

(Note that USB-C Power Delivery requires the use of cables that have embedded chips to tell the two sides that it is safe to transmit >5V and >15W of power. If in the process of measuring power, you changed out a PD-complaint cable for non-PD-compliant cabling, that may have forced a fallback to traditional USB power that would prevent you from measuring what you were trying to measure.)

This StackExchange Electrical Engineering thread says that according to USB specifications, "the 5V is supposed to be +-5% under load, which translates to 4.75V to 5.25V." If that's true, the 4.84V is within normal variance for 5V power. But this doesn't sound like the "higher voltage" power that the monitor manual talks about in Chapter 3, or the "at least 15W power supply" that the monitor manual talks about in Chapter 6.

Computer problems often have MANY moving parts, and very, very, very, often the actual causes are things that were NOT on your original suspects list.

For example, many display problems today are caused by cables that are perfectly good, but are not up to a high enough standard to do the jobs they are being asked to do.

You keep telling readers you tried multiple displays and all must be unsupported and therefore Macs are defective.

But to help you, we need to be able to replicate at least the specs of what you are using, and make certain it is all reasonable and there are no obvious distractions provided by any assumption or experimental setup error or mistakes you might be making.

We keep asking you to please do your due diligence and report to us the EXACT experiment setup you are using, in complete detail, including:

• EXACTLY what make& model display you care about (so we can look up its specs and be certain it should be expected to work in these circumstances)

• EXACTLY what cables and adapters, including whether they are certified, or have Trademarks on them, and about HOW LONG they are. (Some are known to not be adequate.)

• EXACTLY what is connected to what, and if the problem persists after a Restart if you do not change ANY cables.