Stills from FCPX are high contrast with crushed blacks?

FCPX 11.


If I 'Save Current Frame' from the FCPX timeline -- the still (PNG) I get is not like the image on the timeline: the contrast is jacked up and the blacks are so black they appear to have been crushed.


It didn't used to be like this. I'm wondering what has happened with FCPX, and if there is a way to correct this?


Note. If I pull the mastered film into Quicktime and isolate the same frame and do a Command C, and the 'New From Clipboard' in Preview I get a perfect exact still.

MacBook Pro 16″, macOS 15.1

Posted on Jan 14, 2025 4:04 PM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Similar questions

45 replies

Jan 18, 2025 5:06 AM in response to Ben Low

If you have Topaz, Photo Zoom isn't any better (or worse). Use what you already have.


I just had to do this with a new edit yesterday, and sure shootin' the stills are much too dark. Filled out feedback form, let the dev team know there's a bug. And it is a bug, because in the past I had a project that I did this a lot on and it was fine. But now it's not. gggrrr...

Jan 18, 2025 7:54 AM in response to Ben Low

Ben Low wrote:

Today I've got a couple of hundred stills to pull that way. My fingers are not happy campers.

You may be averse to paying a years subscription ($120 or so) to Adobe but you would save yourself hours and maybe days of work as you could automate the entire process in Lightroom Classic. All you would need to do is export the chosen stills, import them into Lightroom and re-export them with a Rec709G2.4 tag using an automated preset. Job done.

Jan 18, 2025 9:36 AM in response to Ben Low

.

Ben Low wrote:

Good point Clint. Though exporting them directly from Quicktime through Preview is a 3 click process. And exporting them from FCPX is about a 6-7 click process. And exporting them old-style from FCPX is still a 2-3 click process ... plus then bringing everything into Lightroom and batch exporting everything out ... at least 3 click process.

I'm adding up clicks here. Seems both processes are about equal. And the reality of filmmaking: lots of clicks regardless. I love shooting a film. Click, the camera is on, click, the camera is off: 2-click process. Editing, on the other hand ... a gazillion clicks no matter how one approaches it.

But. When I complain ... I immediately think of other jobs I could be doing ...



Adding up the clicks, I’m only talking about the clicks after you have created the stills - part 2 of the job.


Doing part 2 in Lightroom would be one single click to import all of the stills, one single command-A click to select all the imported stills and one single click to export all them once you have created the export preset (a few clicks in total). You can also scale/resize as part of the export. I think that would save a huge number of extra clicks with the subsequent copying and pasting for each image however you do it. I don’t mean to be annoying, I’m just saying easy it would be to automate all of part 2 for a small investment

Jan 16, 2025 6:47 AM in response to Ben Low



Ben Low wrote:

Thank you most kindly for your help Clint! If I stumble across any other solution I'll report it in this post. It would be nice to go directly from the timeline ... often the stills are required before the film is completed. Maybe Apple will fix the bug ...



No worries Ben. Hopefully you will find a solution. I think this method is the easiest workaround for anyone with Lightroom or Photoshop so maybe it will help others anyway.


Jan 16, 2025 8:49 AM in response to Ian R. Brown

Fantabulous Ian. Good idea. I used to use Resolve (to colour grade), till I fell in love with FCPX.


The nice thing about working with the timeline is one can isolate the still one wants much quicker, slipping back and forth to find it. In Quicktime the scale is too big, so one actually has to play the movie to get close, then frame back and forth (clumsier).


Will try Resolve today. Thank you for that ...


Ben

Jan 18, 2025 8:40 AM in response to Clint Gryke

Good point Clint. Though exporting them directly from Quicktime through Preview is a 3 click process. And exporting them from FCPX is about a 6-7 click process. And exporting them old-style from FCPX is still a 2-3 click process ... plus then bringing everything into Lightroom and batch exporting everything out ... at least 3 click process.


I'm adding up clicks here. Seems both processes are about equal. And the reality of filmmaking: lots of clicks regardless. I love shooting a film. Click, the camera is on, click, the camera is off: 2-click process. Editing, on the other hand ... a gazillion clicks no matter how one approaches it.


But. When I complain ... I immediately think of other jobs I could be doing ...

Jan 18, 2025 9:01 AM in response to Tom Wolsky

Dang!!! You're absolutely right. I hadn't thought of that. I'm so glad you mentioned it. I was blithely producing stills here ... at 72 dpi ... duh? ...


So I checked in Topaz. I can reset the default preference output resolution to 300 ppi. Zowie.


Note: done a few tests; it appears one has to 'Upscale' the image to get the 300 ppi. Just running it through, denoise, sharpen (4K to 4K) still only gives you the 72 ppi for some reason. The 'Upscaling' is what does the trick. Apparently.


You just saved me a huge bunch of work T! I very much appreciate that. Thank you most kindly. The ones I've already done I'll bring into Preview and change the dpi/ppi to 300. I think I've done that before, regularly, and it seems to work at the printer.


B.





Jan 18, 2025 10:09 AM in response to Tom Wolsky

I don't know if one can do this in a post ... but here is a temp website I've set up, prior to releasing the film.


dancingbear.info


And there are two versions of the film (long and shorter) and a trailer viewable on the 'Screening' page. The trailer gives an accurate idea of what the film is about. Someone showed up on my doorstep out of the blue one day (out in BC, Canada), with twenty minutes of raw video footage taken of a friend of his, wanting to know if a film could be made. And this is the film that got made.

Jan 18, 2025 10:35 AM in response to Clint Gryke

Smart advice Clint.


I'm actually working a lot on the stills after-the-fact. Extra colour grading and up-rezzing and Topaz etc. to get them to look good in print. A lot of the film was shot in various forms of HD, so the 'stills' pulled need some serious attention. And I'm also formatting the book itself - so need to have a good idea of end-results before the thing goes to the printer.


If it was just a matter of pulling the stills to go straight to the printer I would take your advice for sure.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Stills from FCPX are high contrast with crushed blacks?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.