Is there a minimum number of HomeKit hubs per property?

I need to control devices in 2 properties. Property A has AppleTV as HomeKit hub. Property B does not have any hub. Is there a way I can control a power socket in property B from property A or is it a requirement to have at least 1 hub in each property?

Posted on Nov 4, 2022 8:58 AM

Similar questions

Manually set home hub Anyone know of a way to manually designate a “primary” hub if you have multiple Apple TVs and HomePods? I need one to stay as primary for my home setup to work and HomeKit regularly rotates and automatically chooses. This functionality would make my life SO much easier.
520 1
Homekit not reliable I'm at my wits end with Homekit. I transitioned from Insteon (which had it's own problems), when the company folded. Since then, it been train of failed devices and non-responding AppleTV hubs. I use Homekit in two homes, both my main home and a vacation home which we do short-term rentals. The vacation home is 3 hours away, and I really need the system to be reliable, but so far I need to make a trip there every 6-8 weeks to fix something with Homekit. The system run lights on automation and allows me to control locks. I have figured out some things along the way: Multiple hubs don't increase reliability. They should, but if one hub goes down, the other won't automatically take it's place. Don't set your Apple TV to automatically update the OS. When it does, you are guaranteed to lose it as a hub until you are on-site to re-configure it. Don't buy Legrand branded wall switches. They lose connection and even freeze operation so that they cannot be even operated by the paddle switch. If they are un-paired from your home, you will not be able to re-pair them. For your WiFi devices, setup a special WiFi SSID that only operates on 2.4 Ghz band for use with those devices. Most gateways and access points will support this. Homekit currently relies on Bluetooth and WiFi for communication only. Bluetooth is more reliable, but it's range is too short to cover most houses, even small ones. WiFi has better coverage, but if you have many devices, this can begin to crowd the address space on a 255.255.255.0 network. Maybe even consider adding a separate sub-net for them. This can be done with some equipment (VLAN), or use a separate Wifi Gateway. Suggestions for Apple: Build and sell a cheap dedicated hub that has support for other communication protocols (Z-wave, Zigbee, etc). They are low power mesh networks which are far more useful and reliable for inter connecting small home-automation devices, and could potentially increase the compatibility of Homekit. Update Homekit for reliability. If this system is not reliable, it ain't worth it! Get out of the home automation market. This may seem like a strange suggestion, but I say it because when Apple enters a market, they tend to elbow-out any competition in their eco-system, in favor of their half-baked offering.
1106 1
“Connected” hubs in HomeKit (1) Why did Apple remove the ability for HomeKit users to designate which of their devices is the preferred “Connected hub”? Ideally all the hubs and bridges listed in the Home app should be able to be prioritized in order of preference, in the event the #1 choice goes down. (2) How does HomeKit and the Home app determine which hub is selected to be the primary Connected one? Is the decision made randomly, or by recency, or some other algorithm? The choice of the wrong device can have disruptive results, e.g. when the distance from an arbitrarily-selected Connected hub is farther from some or all accessories or bridges to connect properly. Here’s some background to these questions from my particular situation: It used to be that you could tell HomeKit which of your devices (AppleTVs, HomePods, HomePod minis, desktop computers) should serve as your Connected hub. But in recent updates, it appears this important functionality has been removed, and the HomeKit app instead runs some sort of algorithm to choose which device should be the Connected one (while others show as on Standby or otherwise active playing music etc.). This change wreaked havoc in my Home system after I installed a new HomePod mini and upgraded everything to 16.3. All of my non-Apple connected HomeKit devices showed “No response” after the installations and upgrades. This included both Philips Hue devices and outlet plugs from iDevices. The accessories could be managed via their native apps, but not in the Home app, and not via Siri. My AppleTVs and HomePod/HomePod minis continued to work for music, weather, etc., but could not be used for turning lights on and off, etc. Initially, at the suggestion of an Apple tech, I tried de-installing my Philips bridge, reinstalling it, and adding all my devices back manually (a giant PITA). This did not improve anything. After another service call, I noticed that my brand new HomePod mini was chosen by HomeKit as the Connected hub among my total of 7 hubs, even though it is by far the furthest from my router (and in fact is in a separate building). It could be reached from the Home app to do things like check the temperature, but it seemed unable to communicate with all of my accessories, and thus causing the No Response status for them. A third Apple tech theorized that this was because the new Mini was jumping from a second router in the outbuilding, downstream of my main router in the house. He felt that perhaps HomeKit was finding the connection between the Mini and this secondary router was particularly strong and thus picking it. However, that made little sense since my Hue bridge and AppleTV 4K are hardwired to my router in the main house, and thus have the best connection. In reading some older threads, I now believe the cause is a Bluetooth issue—that the Mini in my outbuilding is out of range of the devices via Bluetooth. I’m not an IT pro, so I could be totally wrong here. But I noticed in an old, closed thread regarding a similar problem, someone stated that: One of these devices becomes the connected HomeKit hub randomly, the rest are in standby and the problem is that some of the HomeKit devices are using Bluetooth LTE and for some Apple TVs are too far away. This comment was from 2022, so it appears this issue has been known to Apple for some time. We need a fix, ideally a simple one which allows the user to say either “treat this hudb as Connected first,” or “Connect in this sequence, or “never use that hub which is too distant from the rest.” Unfortunately the only solution I have right now is to just not use the new Mini ($99 purchase) in my outbuilding. Unplugging it from that location is the only “fix” I’ve found, after three support calls, which is kind of like curing a headache with decapitation...
3030 15

1 reply

turingtest2

Level 10

277,979 points

Nov 4, 2022 9:38 AM in response to arols

You need at least one home hub in each home.

tt2

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Is there a minimum number of HomeKit hubs per property?

Welcome to Apple Support Community

A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.

Learn more Sign up